Responsible AI
Useful technology.
Human responsibility.
Principles for considering automation in recruitment without losing sight of the people affected by a decision.
Be clear about the purpose
Start with the problem a tool is meant to solve. Define an appropriate use, the information it needs, and the decisions that must remain with a responsible person.
Do not confuse an output with evidence
Generated summaries and rankings can contain errors or miss context. Check important information against an appropriate source and give people a way to correct an inaccurate interpretation.
Protect personal information
Use only the information necessary for an agreed purpose. Do not place candidate data into an unapproved tool or assume that every vendor handles information in the same way.
Review the human impact
Consider who could be excluded, what an assessment actually measures, and whether a person can access an alternative process. Monitor behaviour in context instead of relying on a claim that a tool is neutral.
Keep decisions explainable
A hiring team should be able to describe the criteria it used and the evidence supporting its judgment. Technology should help that conversation become clearer.
What this site does
The on-site search matches text against a static page index. The navigation assistant presents predefined links. Neither feature uses an AI model, evaluates candidates, or makes hiring decisions. These principles describe an approach to technology, not a claim of an audited AI governance programme.
A question about this experience?
Use the contact form to prepare a message. The current website saves a draft to your device; it does not send the message.
Discuss recruitment technology